I love this!

Jun182010
Chris Gupton
YouTube Preview Image

Great Billboard for McDonald’s

Jun152010
Chris Gupton

mcd_1

Nike told AdAge this was their best ad ever!

May212010
Chris Gupton
YouTube Preview Image
TAGS: Comment (1)

AIGA Raleigh and NC State – College of Design present AdamsMorioka

Mar312010
Barbara Schneider

SA_website-RALEIGH

Sean Adams: AdamsMorioka, A Very Special Episode.
Wednesday, April 14, 2010 6:30 pm – 9:00 pm Burns Auditorium @ NC State – College of Design – Kamphoefner Hall
NC State College of Design
Boney Dr
Raleigh, NC 27605

AIGA Raleigh will be presenting an evening of insight and inspiration with Sean Adams, as he discusses the evolution of the AdamsMorioka brand. He will talk in depth about their self-promotion practices and how that relates to business.

As he describes it, “This will be a frank and honest discussion answering some of the questions I’ve heard over the years. How did we start? Is it true we’re media whores? If so, how did we do it? How do we decide what to work on? Has Noreen ever abused me? And any other question you may have, but would be afraid to ask.”

Sean Adams has been recognized by every major competition and publication — from Communication Arts and Graphis to AIGA and the New York Art Director’s Club.

AdamsMorioka has been exhibited often including a solo exhibition at The San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. Sean is President ex officio and past national board member of AIGA, and President ex officio of AIGA Los Angeles. He teaches at Art Center College of Design, is a frequent lecturer and competition judge internationally, and has been cited as one of the 40 most important people shaping design internationally in the ID40.

TAGS: Comment (1)

Photo Saturation Drowns Real Skill

Mar252010
Melea Mauldin

In our age of constant photo uploading, instant gratification video and whirlwind citizen journalism, it’s hard to remember what made photography so popular in the first place.

Hank Klibanoff of The New York Times shares beautiful memories of where photojournalism originated.  Even now in our over-saturated world, these photos still stand out.

Are amateur citizen journalists drowning out the traditional artistic talent of photojournalism?

What’s your message?

Nov132009
Billy Barnes

You have to think through your communication carefully or else it could send a different message than the one you intended.  This one, for example, makes me want to run out and buy a bottle of JD just as fast as I can.

DownloadedFile

Warm up your audience

Sep292009
Bruce Hall

There are some interesting implications for how we do

advertising in some recent research on temperature. The

science blog Neurophilosophy asks, why is it that we have so

many metaphors which relate temperature to social distance? We

might, for example, hold “warm feelings” for somebody, and

extend them a “warm welcome”, while giving somebody else “the

cold shoulder” or “an icy stare”. These aren’t just figures

of speech: we judge others on the basis of warmth because

abstract concepts, such as affection, are firmly grounded in

bodily sensations.

Several different experiments have shown that physically

warming people up, by itself, causes them to feel warmer

relationships to the people and things around them. And the

interaction between social cognition and temperature is

bi-directional: warmer temperatures induce social proximity,

while loneliness makes people feel colder.

We don’t usually think about the physical temperature we

communicate in ads, at least not on a conscious level. But it

has an impact on how people feel about what they see in the

ad. It changes the nature of their engagement with the

characters in an ad. Since one of those characters is the

brand, that will also affect their future engagement with the

brand, not just the ad.

It would be interesting to compare the temperature profiles of

ad campaigns within categories, to see how that contributes to

the long term success of the brand. Corona’s warm tropical

breezes have been part of a long-term success story. Coors

Light finally broke through with a cold message– will the

brand be able to maintain a social bond among its users, or

will it establish a franchise of lonely losers who like thin

beer? That could of course be a huge franchise,

business-wise, but the focus groups would be grimly

depressing.

Thoughts and comments welcome.CL Love Train

Foiled Again

Aug312009
Bruce Hall

Another nasty blow for traditional question-and-answer research to find out what consumers think about aesthetic materials. From an ingenious experiment reported in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, we learn that:
“Two experiments examined whether appreciating art verbally would aesthetically confuse viewers. Participants were asked to verbalize why they either liked or disliked two different kinds of paintings; one piece was representational, the other piece was abstract. Those who verbalized their reasons for liking the artworks were more likely to prefer the representational painting, whereas those who verbalized their reasons for disliking the paintings were also more likely to dislike the representational painting. While it was easy to describe reasons for both liking and disliking representational art, the same proved difficult for abstract art. The findings suggest that due to its figurative qualities people will be encouraged to generate reasons to describe representational art, rather than abstract art, and that these reasons could potentially be biased and cause them to change their preferences in line with these reasons.”

This study was about fine art, but it applies to advertising and design, as well.  To interpret, the more representational (i.e. ‘left-brained’) an ad may be, the more reasons respondents will find to like it. The more abstract (i.e., ‘right-brained’) the fewer reasons they’ll find to like it. Ads that are abstract and emotional are fighting an uphill battle in focus groups and surveys when they’re pitted against ads that are literal and logical.

Sit up and listen

Aug192009
Bruce Hall

We always think about reach, frequency, and cost per

impression when we evaluate media choices for an ad we want to

place. But we rarely if ever integrate the message with not

where, but how, the target audience receives it.

Research on how the body position of the recipient of a

message affects how they react to the message now shows that

both the ‘how’ and the ‘where’ matter. (Harmon-Jones, E., &

Peterson, C. K. (in press). Supine Body Position Reduces

Neural Response to Anger Evocation. Psychological Science)

Researchers found that when respondents were in a reclining

position, they were less likely to react by demonstrating

approach motivation, or the urge to move toward something.

Approach motivation is closely linked to positive activation.

Since this positive activation of emotion is what we usually

seek to elicit in advertising messages, that turns out to be

an important finding. If the viewer or listener is in a

reclining position, they are less likely to experience

positive approach motivation (defined as joy that urges one to

move toward the source of the joy).

The obvious issue here is television watching. Print ads,

radio, and interactive media are much more likely to be

accessed from a sitting position, compared to television (at

least that’s my assumption, there doesn’t seem to be much data

on that.) So the richness of television’s multimedia

experience may be working against the “LaZBoy factor”.

So how do we get the audience to sit up and listen? Maybe

with DRTV we need to get people to sit up with a free

sweepstakes offer or something, to increase their approach

motivation for the real offer.

And how about you? Do you sit up when you watch TV, or are you

lying down ignoring all those expensive ads we run?
recliner2

Mental Subtraction and the Whopper

Jul232009
Bruce Hall

Stimulating a strong emotional response on the part of the

viewer of an ad is critical if the ad is to be effective in

driving behavior. But that doesn’t necessarily tell us how to

create that emotional response from an ad. It just tells us we

want one.

Last week at our internal Lunch ‘n Learn, where we talked

about creative work, we looked at tv ads that had received

recognition in the business,and looked at how emotion worked

in those ads. Two of the most famous, and most-acclaimed,

were the original “Got Milk” ad, and the more-recent “Whopper

Freakout”. Both shared a common theme, taking away the brand

from the consumer rather than sharing it with him. I

suggested that the use of the counter-factual, absence rather

than presence of something, might have added emotional power.

It requires imagination, which can be a more powerful stimulus

than observation.

A new study in the Journal of Personality and Social

Psychology now provides some solid data to support that

interpretation. For years happiness researchers have done

studies showing that acts of gratitude, such as writing notes

of appreciation, can have a significant positive effect on

individuals’ life satisfaction and happiness. Now the power

of the counter-factual has also been established. As described

in Mind Matters:

“The researchers show that people prompted to write about how

a positive event may not have happened experience a greater

uptick in mood than those prompted to describe the positive

event.”

In other words, feeling appreciation for a relationship you

have may not make you feel as good as imagining what your life

might have been like if you had never met the person.

If this trick of mental subtraction (What if I’d never met my

husband?) works for relationships, it seems logical that it

works for other things too (What if I couldn’t get a Whopper?)